<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
><channel><title>Commentaires sur : Correcting Tahar Benjelloun</title><atom:link href="/national-article-114870-fr/correcting-tahar-benjelloun.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>/national-article-114870-fr/correcting-tahar-benjelloun.html</link><description>Portail d\&#039;actualité Marocain</description><lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 16:53:24 +0000</lastBuildDate><sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod><sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency><item><title>Par : R. Laanani</title><link>/national-article-114870-fr/correcting-tahar-benjelloun.html/comment-page-1#comment-122067</link><dc:creator><![CDATA[R. Laanani]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 16:53:24 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=114870#comment-122067</guid><description><![CDATA[Dear &quot;Observateur&quot;,
First off, I do not know why you should hide your name since you are all too free to say what you deem right. Second, if you take the same point of Benjelloun why not state it explicitly and not delve into the unsaid? The idea of &quot;claiber&quot; in the article involves Benjelloun and Ibn Taymia may Allah have mercy on him and not a third party!
Sincerely,]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Dear « Observateur »,<br />First off, I do not know why you should hide your name since you are all too free to say what you deem right. Second, if you take the same point of Benjelloun why not state it explicitly and not delve into the unsaid? The idea of « claiber » in the article involves Benjelloun and Ibn Taymia may Allah have mercy on him and not a third party!<br />Sincerely,</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Par : Observateur</title><link>/national-article-114870-fr/correcting-tahar-benjelloun.html/comment-page-1#comment-122017</link><dc:creator><![CDATA[Observateur]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:01:03 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=114870#comment-122017</guid><description><![CDATA[AS you&#039;re &quot; correcting&quot;,and not only criticising , Tahar Benjellon, this means, and following your own logic,that you are of a much bigger caliber than his. Great!. Or am I perhaps wrong?]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>AS you&rsquo;re  » correcting »,and not only criticising , Tahar Benjellon, this means, and following your own logic,that you are of a much bigger caliber than his. Great!. Or am I perhaps wrong?</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Par : Aissa</title><link>/national-article-114870-fr/correcting-tahar-benjelloun.html/comment-page-1#comment-121994</link><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aissa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 19:21:17 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=114870#comment-121994</guid><description><![CDATA[There is no need to correct him!
Ibn Taymiya is Ibn Taymiya, every single muslim know him, but how many muslims know Tahar Benjelloun ?]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>There is no need to correct him!<br />Ibn Taymiya is Ibn Taymiya, every single muslim know him, but how many muslims know Tahar Benjelloun ?</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Par : متتبع للأحداث</title><link>/national-article-114870-fr/correcting-tahar-benjelloun.html/comment-page-1#comment-121988</link><dc:creator><![CDATA[متتبع للأحداث]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 19:52:46 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=114870#comment-121988</guid><description><![CDATA[المقالة محاولة تصحيح ما جنح إليه الطاهر بنجلون بعد أن نعت شيخ الإسلام بجد داعش الأكبر وأنه متعطش للعنف]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>المقالة محاولة تصحيح ما جنح إليه الطاهر بنجلون بعد أن نعت شيخ الإسلام بجد داعش الأكبر وأنه متعطش للعنف</p>]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>